Как спросил знаменитого этнографа Маргарет Мид (доказывавшую, что гендерные роли — чистая условность, и любое занятие, которое в каком-то племени считается женским, в другом будет мужским и наоборот), "Мэгги, может быть, тебе известно племя, в котором рожают мужчины?".
Интересно что Маргарет Мид несколько сменила риторику после того как один усатый чувак отошел от управления страной (в мир иной).
In it, she asked:

Have we over-domesticated men, denied their natural adventurousness, tied them down to machines that are after all only glorified spindles and looms, mortars and pestles and digging sticks, all of which were once women’s work? Have we cut women off from their natural closeness to their children, taught them to look for a job instead of the touch of a child’s hand, for status in a competitive world rather than a unique place by a glowing hearth?

Mead allowed that she had shifted emphasis between 1935’s Sex and Temperament and 1949’s Male and Female. But, she explained to Klein, there was a logic: ‘one couldn’t talk about real sex differences without talking first about acquired ones.’ She had also decided that ‘temperament was not a very good place to put major emphasis [in the 1930s], given the state of the world.’ 
https://aeon.co/essays/when-it-came-to-sex-and-gender-margaret-mead-had-it-both-ways (https://aeon.co/essays/when-it-came-to-sex-and-gender-margaret-mead-had-it-both-ways)